This page provides a summary of all publications by Dr Massimo Mangialavori

Presentation of Mangialavori’s texts by Giovanni Marotta

” … I would therefore like to acknowledge Mangialavori’s great contribution to the knowledge of Materia Medica: the homeopathic observation material that Massimo has collected over the last 30 years, through an impressive clinical case history, gathered with meticulous attention, constitutes such a wealth of information that – I speak with authority – it will be a subject of study for generations of homeopaths. There are hundreds of remedies, I believe more than seven hundred now, which Massimo knows thoroughly, both in their essential aspects and in their details, as well as in their personality profile and general and local characteristics.”

Book preface: Milks in Homeopathic Medicine

I met Massimo Mangialavori in 1988. He had just returned from a long stay in Latin America, where he had been in close contact with some highly respected Andean masters and had deeply absorbed the knowledge of that culture. At that time, I was teaching homeopathy, continuing the studies of Dr. Masi Elizalde, although I was beginning to distance myself from the Argentine master’s model, which I found somewhat rigid, and was working with my colleagues at CIMI on a broader clinical approach that sought to integrate both physical and emotional experiences into the treatment of patients.

No sooner had he stepped off the plane than Massimo joined the course, full of enthusiasm!

It didn’t take me long to realise that the very young Mangialavori had remarkable qualities: a highly intuitive intelligence and, at the same time, a great ability to organise himself rationally, a freedom of thought that allowed him to cultivate a deep interest in traditional cultures and to be equally open to all scientific discoveries. I was struck by how comfortable he was both deciphering ancient wisdom texts and making the best use of the most modern technological and IT tools, always up to date in the field.

Furthermore, something I consider very important, which I have learned to appreciate about him over time, is that if Massimo is not an expert on a subject, he researches it, studies it and, above all, seeks the input of those who know more. I have seen him grow over the years and master subjects he was not previously familiar with, thanks to his great desire to learn and his humility in recognising what he did not know.

Our friendship was based on a shared understanding in many areas, and we shared significant travels, knowledge and experiences, not only in homeopathy. His contribution has always been very generous, and his presence at some critical moments in my life has been truly important.

I remember that when we first met, the enthusiasm with which he had decided not to pursue a brilliant career as a heart surgeon but to devote himself entirely to Homeopathic Medicine brought us together immediately. He showed me a copy of the computerised repertory extractions he had printed out – a stack of photocopies that took a whole briefcase to carry around and weighed a ton! – and I realised that every symptom, in every rubric and every section, was underlined several times: he was on his third reading of tens of thousands of symptoms, the cross and delight of our profession as unicist homeopaths. What I was laboriously trying to do with the symptoms in Mind, he had already done for the entire repertory! And it wasn’t just an exercise in translation and memory: he already had the idea of organising the myriad symptoms into something more concise and coherent, so as to facilitate the accuracy of the prescription.

In line with the search for coherent images of our remedies, a collaboration began that continues to this day. He affectionately calls me “maestro”, but I must publicly acknowledge that he is the maestro.

And I say this with good reason, because he has helped me many times, both in my knowledge of remedies, after years of attending his seminars on materia medica, and in the practice of Homeopathic Medicine. I usually gain a good understanding of the patient during the first consultation: years of empathetic listening, psychological preparation and meditation help me to delve deeper into even intimate and painful issues. But how can I translate what emerges from the relationship into a good remedy? That’s where I “bang my head”, as I often say, when I can’t find the analogy between the person’s experiences and the remedies I know. Then the repertory symptom added by Massimo helps me to reflect on substances that are unfamiliar to me. I go and read about the remedies in the Materia Medica, but above all I read his cases, where the symptom is contextualised in a coherent story, and very often I find the effective prescription I was hoping for.

Rereading the various cases reported in the book, can you imagine how many times we have prescribed Staphysagria in a case of Lac asinum or Silicea in a case of Lac felinum, making ourselves and homeopathy look like a medicine that works poorly or not at all?

And Lac Lupinum? Would we have given Thuya for mediumship? Nitric remedies for hypochondria? Well, we would have gone from similar to similar with little or no effect!

I would therefore like to acknowledge Mangialavori’s great contribution to the knowledge of Materia Medica: the homeopathic observation material that Massimo has collected over the last 30 years, through an impressive clinical case history, gathered with meticulous attention, constitutes such a wealth of information that – I speak with authority – it will be a subject of study for generations of homeopaths. There are hundreds of remedies, I believe more than seven hundred by now, which Massimo knows thoroughly, both in their essential aspects and in their details, both in their personality profile and in their general and local characteristics.

I hope they will soon be published, as was the case with this very interesting book on milks: the first of his “enterprise” to compile his Clinical Materia Medica.

Mangialavori’s idea of studying remedies “in vivo”, i.e. from the reports of people who have demonstrated over the years that they respond well to a given remedy, has provided living, up-to-date images of the remedies and validated well-conducted provings.

The result is an important contribution, evident from reading the cases, in terms of mind-body unity. Think of the emphasis given today to the intimate relationship between psyche and soma, from the first stirrings of Alexander to the more substantial studies of PNEI (psycho-neuro-endocrine-immunology) and numerous other models that seek to integrate bodily experiences with those of the soul. Well, compared to current psycho-somatic knowledge, Mangialavori’s cases provide us with much richer and clearer paradigms of psycho-somatic relationships than those usually considered. These are stories of authentic and personalised suffering, which do not invoke generic and overused “stress” as their sole motive, but bring out the relationship between inner experiences and physical and relational events in a much more profound and articulated way. They therefore constitute excellent material for study and research, which I hope will be used by students and colleagues, not only homeopaths.

Homeopathy has always been a psychosomatic medicine par excellence, given that our brilliant founder Hahnemann carried out his provings by noting symptoms ranging from the mind to the tips of the toes, recording precise observations of localised and general symptoms, as well as emotional and behavioural elements.

Hahnemann knew well that the anthropos is a complex system. If his research into tackling the problem of disease had focused exclusively on physio-pathological data, it would have been reductionist: it would have excluded a priori a series of highly significant experiences and the very purpose of homeopathic therapy.

It was no coincidence that Hahnemann felt the need to “treat differently” his patients, aware of the correlations between physical pain and suffering, between illness and living conditions, between identity and somatic integrity. This idea is as old as medicine itself but, unfortunately, due to the positivist origins of modern medicine, it has been partially eclipsed. The positivist epistemological background has led to the prevalence of a model defined as bio-mechanical (a re-edition of the Cartesian body-machine), based on a rigorous determinism based on the principle of linear causality (Alberto Panza).

Well, I believe that Homeopathic Medicine can open important doors in this area, and I hope that it will emerge from the enclave in which it has placed itself in recent years and engage, on the one hand, with the world of conventional science and medicine and, on the other, with psychiatrists, psychotherapists, psychoanalysts and those who take a systemic approach to health. In this way, Homeopathy will re-establish its valuable role in the scientific field, thanks to its specific expertise, “in the integration of knowledge”.

To this end, I hope that the publication of all the remedies known to Mangialavori will take place in the near future. However, I am well aware of the amount of work involved in publishing a book on materia medica such as this: firstly, because it is not a copy of copies of traditional materia medica; the material is, in fact, completely new; secondly, thanks to the author’s clinical experience, Mangialavori has not limited himself to simply reporting the cases treated, but has extrapolated the themes necessary for the identification of the “homeopathic family” in general and of the individual components in particular, offering a broad psychic and somatic perspective.

In some ways, this is a pioneering work still in progress, but in other ways, it is already at an excellent level of development, providing us with material that is easy to understand for those who “study” and have a “desire for research”.

I expressly use the words “studying” and “research” because the limitation of Mangialavori’s message is not in what he proposes, but in what does not reach the reader due to a lack of familiarity with some basic premises. Without a personal course of study and research on the part of the doctor or student of homeopathic medicine, Mangialavori’s message – which is one of integration of experiences – risks not being understood in its entirety but fragmented, as usual, into the various symptoms that compose it.

Fragmentation is the cross to bear in homeopathic prescription, the cause of all attempts that come to nothing in the vain search for the simillimum remedy. It must be made absolutely clear that symptoms do not have a single meaning; they must be modelled and contextualised in order to understand their specificity and actual dynamics. “Paratactic” repertorisations, those carried out using the conjunction “and”, i.e. those of patients who present this symptom and then that symptom and then another, almost never lead to a coherent picture: neither of the person, nor of the remedy that could represent them. On the other hand, the identification of fundamental, general and characteristic symptoms that give a clear idea of how the “complex system” we are working on is organised – be it the remedy or an organism to be treated – is the key to a correct prescription.

This is a very important point in the Method of Complexity in Homeopathic Medicine, discussed at length in the first volume of Mangialavori’s Praxis and documented theoretically and clinically in the second volume, which Massimo asked me to collaborate on.

Another aspect that I would like to highlight in Mangialavori’s work is the study of the substances that give rise to remedies. Massimo, mindful of his Andean studies and his background in traditional medicine, has always based his study of remedies on knowledge of the basic substance of the remedy, whether mineral, vegetable, animal, fungal, bacterial, imponderable, human or other. Knowledge of a substance can be “mediated”, i.e. derived from scientific reports or traditional knowledge, or “direct”, in the sense of observation, empathetic contact with the substance itself, seeking to understand its internal organisation and its own way of being in the world.

This is not phenomenological knowledge, but structural knowledge. It is a matter of understanding how a given “individual of nature” – as alchemists would call it – or “system” – as systemic science would call it – organises or structures itself in order to exist: what characteristic fragilities and vulnerabilities it has, what its strengths and resources are, along which lines it becomes unbalanced. In a word, its resilience.

Every individual in nature is a complex system, characterised above all by the process that brings it into being and interacts with an environment that is equally complex. According to the perspective of two broad-minded researchers, Maturana and Varela, every biological system is autopoietic: informationally closed and autonomous, and possesses the capacity to reorganise itself. Its behaviour is produced by the relationship between the different components of the system, which reacts when disturbed by environmental stimuli (Maturana and Varela, 1987).

This complexity is unique to each individual.

In light of this systemic view, the work suggested by Mangialavori is very interesting because it connects direct or mediated knowledge of the “system-substance”, its provings and clinical experience “in the living body”, organising a set of symptoms, which are in themselves very varied and apparently unrelated, into coherent pictures.

If we talk specifically about the Milks, we see that there are – as can be seen from the cases in this book – constant patterns that apply to the whole group of Milks in general and others that apply to each Milk in particular: undoubtedly, the starting substance recalls in some way certain characteristics deriving from the ethology of the species to which it belongs. The similarities strike us because they show an analogy with animal behaviours that are familiar to us: easily identifiable, as they are mammals, which are species very close to the human race. It can sometimes be more difficult to grasp such analogies with more distant worlds such as minerals, plants, fungi and others … even though they are also very significant.

Personally, in the case of Milks, rather than “phenomenal” analogies, I would emphasise a much more “structural” and fundamental “signature”, which originates from the feeding methods inherent in breastfeeding in mammals: a process that involves a relationship with the mother that lasts for months, if not years, and develops a mother-child “symbiosis” that is fundamental for the first months of life. Physiologically – or at least this is how it should be – the new individual “weans” itself to become increasingly autonomous in life, to complete what Jung called the process of “individuation”, i.e. a continuous transformation of one’s individuality that characterises all existence. In his book Psychological Types, Jung writes, among many interesting observations: ‘… Individuation is always more or less in conflict with collective norms, since it is separation and differentiation from the general and the development of the particular; not, however, of a sought-after particularity, but of a particularity already a priori founded in the natural disposition’.

Well, in infants, the “particularity based on their natural disposition” is eclipsed by the need for loyalty to their mother and family context, albeit with the sometimes very clear awareness of the castrating bond that is created. At the same time, there is a strong desire to break free, which generates intense inner conflict. This results in a form of emotional dependence that leads to strong neurotic inhibitions, painful inner conflict and equally painful aggression. In some cases, especially where the context is based on factors that are (at least apparently) highly emotional, marked aspects of self-effacement emerge. If we were to use the language of neuroendocrine mediators, I would define these behaviours as “prolactinic” and “oxytocinic”: that is, we find an excessive commitment to “taking care” of others, children, family, friends and patients, to the detriment of one’s own personal needs. In other cases, elements of aggression prevail, which are all the more repressed the stronger the insecurity, abandonment and self-castration. The self-sacrificing attitude clearly plays a compensatory role, but in the end it is not very adaptive, because it is based on blocking the process of individuation.

On the other hand, I would like to make a small digression in terms of neuroendocrine profiles: the type oriented towards the pleasure of “living physically in the body” and self-protection is mediated above all by serotonin, the most important neurotransmitter that allows us to feel pleasure in the physical body, such as food, sleep, sex and physical activity. If we consider that 90% of serotonin is produced in the intestine and that it is one of the main causes of headaches, the general picture of Milks finds some very interesting somatic correlates.

There are many aspects I would like to highlight, the result of hours and hours of meetings and exchanges with many colleagues who have formed a wonderful study group around Massimo. I will limit myself to one last observation that I consider fundamental and that emerges constantly from Mangialavori’s cases: the “pathway”.

The aim of our homeopathic therapy is not limited to symptomatic and localised improvements: in the case of a good simillimum, the “process” begins whereby people, albeit at the cost of inner crises, resume their life journey.

I would like to thank Massimo Mangialavori for his contributions to the homeopathic community and to medicine as a whole.

Giovanni Marotta

Rome, 31 August 2016

Something about what I have published

I feel it is my duty and pleasure to take advantage of this space to thank from the bottom of my heart those who have allowed me to make public the studies and work of many years. The Beatles sang “With a little help from my friends”… in my case, the help has been enormous, tireless, masterful, selfless, mainly the result of having shared my vision of Homeopathic Medicine and attempting to share it with interested colleagues, in the hope that our brick will contribute to building the temple of Homeopathy.

Countless hours of work certainly cannot be repaid by the sale of a few books. First and foremost, you have to believe in it and hope for something greater than yourself.

First and foremost, thank you to Betty Wood, without her, none of the seminars from which some of these books were extracted would have been possible. Without Betty and other colleagues in that group, the English version of Praxis would never have been published.

But, in particular, without Betty, Krista Heron and John Sobraske, who for years have been connecting via video conference almost every week, listening, helping me to clarify and edit the text in English, the Materia Medica Clinica and the volumes on Polychrests would never have seen the light of day.

Special thanks also to Rossana Ceriani for quietly embarking on this project and working with all her energy and passion on the translation of so many books for a market, the Italian one, which could not be smaller or less interested.

Clinical Materia Medica of Homeopathic Families

Materia Medica of the most well-known polycrests

Other books from Mangialavori’s seminars

Methodology

  • Praxis (also available in Italian and German)

Appunti da seminari

  • Tutti
  • Cec
  • Deu
  • Eng
  • Ita
  • Por
Arnica montana is most likely the most widely used homeopathic remedy in the world, even without a prescription: a name well known as symptomatic by common users, therapists and doctors with varying degrees of training in so-called classical homeopathic therapy. Arnica, like Apis, Belladonna, Colocynthis, Hepar sulphur, Mezereum and many others, has traditionally been used for acute suffering, forgetting that both before and after the particular way of falling ill described in the provings, there is much, much more. For most remedies, the clinical experience of what precedes and follows the emerging phase of the provings is, all in all, easily observable: homeopathic symptoms, common syndromes and pathologies, particular behaviours, anxieties, fears, phobias ... both in the early and late years of life. 
Arnica and its similars are an excellent example of a very different organisation; if there are no traumatic experiences, which are extremely difficult to deal with, a good part of these remedies are well known for the first part of their apparently healthy life, an almost enviable condition, an experience of almost no illness or discomfort, often triumphing in their excellent resilience and quick recovery.
Our literature, however, also describes something of the overt imbalance of Arnica and its similars: patients which cannot tolerate themselves as a patient. Someone who, despite his ailments, refuses to see a doctor or take medicine and, if anything, manages his own treatment. A patient who sees doctors and healthcare facilities as the cause of his problems, which began when he is forced to deal with them.
Serious inflammatory diseases with fatal outcomes are not uncommon in soma: after years of well-being and an impeccable, healthy lifestyle, their own bodies betray them.
The alpha and omega of Arnica are not easy to investigate and in most cases it is the patient himself who does not participate, does not want to, cannot. Even when they are forced to, they use every strategy to be elusive. If my interpretation, if my experience with Arnica-like patients, is really worthy of reflection, then it may not be so difficult to understand why such an interesting remedy, so rich in homeopathic symptoms in our repertory, so useful in chronic conditions, can be downgraded to one of the most acute remedies in our literature. 
Other remedies, similar to Arnica but botanically different, such as Hamamelis virginiana and Hydrastis canadensis, can easily be confused with the prince of vulneraries: a concept of homeopathic taxonomy already introduced in the text on Oils, a cornerstone of the Method of Complexity centred on the analogies of homeopathic clinical practice, which I clearly prefer to other grouping hypotheses.
This sixth volume proposes a group of remedies whose progenitor is well known but at the same time superficially described in our literature. Yet in the past, the little mountain flower was not only used for the outcome of trauma or abscesses (then potentially fatal) but also for varicose veins, diabetes, deforming arthritis, heart failure, tuberculosis and tumors.
Natural history, materia medica, clinical cases with long follow-up and authorised by the patient, repertory additions, differential diagnosis. Summary of the fundamental themes, characteristics, coherent groups of symptoms, motifs, pathologies and syndromes successfully treated in my personal case history for the following remedies:
1) Arnica montana 
2) Achillea millefolium 
3) Bellis perennis 
4) Calendula officinalis 
5) Erigeron canadensis 
6) Eupatorium perfoliatum 
7) Eupatorium purpureum 
8) Gnaphalium polycephalum 
9) Helianthus annuum 
10) Cina officinalis 
11) Chamomilla vulgaris 
12) Leontopodium alpinum 
13) Hydrastis canadensis 
12) Hamamelis virginiana
The main topic covered in this book is extremely relevant. The most of the cases presented are deliberately related to the diagnosis of autistic spectrum disorder: a condition that has been increasing significantly in recent years, not only because it seems less difficult to make such clinical observations. Obviously, I am far from believing that it is easy to treat patients of this kind, that it can only be done with good homeopathic therapy, or that only these few remedies are the only effective ones for seriously addressing autistic spectrum disorder. However, I feel it is my duty to inform my colleagues that I have been dealing with this problem for many years and have observed very interesting results, especially with remedies belonging to the homeopathic family of Oils. The following cases demonstrate this: there is clear progress in recurrent or chronic conditions, such as improved communication skills and greater independence, right through to quality of life in the broadest sense. 
This volume also gives us the opportunity to address another important element of the Method of Complexity in Homeopathic Medicine: the relationship, the “vertical” connection between certain remedies: substances that are not necessarily relevant to known taxonomies, but whose organisation demonstrates the same interesting and demonstrable analogies as in previous volumes.
“In the volume dedicated to the homeopathic family of oils, the investigation into the characteristic features of this family of remedies is not carried out by compiling sterile catalogues of characteristic symptoms, but by taking us to the heart of a participatory relationship with painful and often dramatic conditions of existence. In this light, the literary reference made by the author in his preface to Frankenstein, the Modern Prometheus is striking. In Shelley's story, the uncertain boundary between life and non-life takes on further connotations through the reference to the theme of monstrosity. As Mangialavori points out, the wrecht, the poor, highly intelligent and sensitive creature, must grow up inside a body that is not his own and develop his resources outside the human community, from which he is excluded because of his strange appearance and his diversity. This is true of the most intense forms of mental suffering: after all, we all tend to label as crazy or monstrous anything that is difficult to understand. 
In this sense, the autistic “spectrum” is like Mary Shelley's “monster”: we should go and look for it where it lives and consider how it lives. If we continue to focus on what it does not do or is not, we will never encounter it”
										(Alberto Panza)
 Special thanks to Prof. Alberto Panza for his introduction to the text. 
Natural history, materia medica, clinical cases with long follow-up and authorised by the patient, repertory additions, differential diagnosis. Summary of the fundamental themes, characteristics, coherent groups of symptoms, motifs, pathologies and syndromes successfully treated in my personal case history for the following remedies.:
1) Oleum animale 
2) Oleum jecoris aselli 
3) Lecithinum 
4) Cholesterinum 
5) Paraffinum 
6) Pix liquida 
7) Eupionum 
8) Kreosotum 
9) Petroleum 
10) Ambra grisea 
11) Indolum 
12) Ichthyolum
One of the cornerstones of the Complexity Method in Homeopathic Medicine is precisely the study and research of coherence between the different vertices through which we observe the relationship between a certain substance and the Anthropos. I must thank spiders for making this clear to me more than 30 years ago when, together with Hans Zwemke, we published “Bitten in the soul”: the first homeopathic medicine book dedicated to an in-depth study of these cute little creatures in our pharmacopoeia.
There are so many similarities between their way of life, the symbolism that describes them from our anthropocentric perspective, the myth of the phallic spider mother, the medical anthropology of the tarantate so wonderfully described by Ernesto De Martino, and our observations as homeopaths.
The sense of persecution, the transgressive and oppositional behaviour, the periodicity, the relationship with rhythm and the dissonance between the patient's time and that of the world around them, the need for an audience forced to suffer and adapt to their acting-out, the proverbial restlessness, the uncoordinated, choreiform motor skills, the paroxysmal suffering that is only partially curable through the patient's own codes and not those of conventional medicine, the capacity for extreme and almost non-stop performances. Not to mention what for years was called “hysteria”: a pathology that does not exist on an objective clinical level, but is subjectively so painful as to be paralysing.
How intriguing it is to recognise these similarities: nothing to do with the toxicology of the real poison, but so much more to do with a symbolic intoxication!
Special thanks to Jeremy Sherr for his introduction to the text.
Natural history, materia medica, clinical cases with long follow-up and authorised by the patient, repertory additions, differential diagnosis. Summary of the fundamental themes, characteristics, coherent groups of symptoms, motifs, pathologies and syndromes successfully treated in my personal case history for the following remedies:
1) Tarentula hispanica
2) Aranea diadema
3) Latrodectus mactans
4) Theridion curassavicum
5) Mygala lasiodora
6) Aranea ixobola
7) Loxosceles reclusa
8) Tela aranearum
9) Buthus australis
10) Androctonos amoreuxii hebraeus
For several years now, I have been paying particular attention to the study of those remedies whose personality profile appears generally more “pleasant” and “positive”. Something similar, in very general terms, to what we have already described in the book on Milks but, in the case of some Rosaceae, much more evident. It seems undeniable to me that we usually tend to consider something clearly dissonant, a defect, a problem, as a “symptom” – or rather a homeopathic symptom. Obviously, when referring to more purely physical symptoms, an ulcer, a fracture or trigeminal pain are clear defects in the system. They hurt. However, if we broaden our observation, even if only to behavioural aspects, it is clear that suspicious, angry, destructive attitudes appear to be “defects” when compared to someone who is open, accommodating, generous ... even self-sacrificing. For many years, it was understandably thought that there was nothing to treat in someone who was likeable, not very complaining and with excellent school results. Today, we know that this is not always the case. In fact, even these “good” rosaceae do indeed become ill, even prematurely and seriously, suffering from heart disease, rheumatic disorders, autoimmune diseases and other serious conditions.
Our literature is full of remedies described mainly with “unpleasant” profiles, especially those following the often rather judgemental observations of homeopaths such as Kent: colleagues who contributed to the creation of “homeopathic stereotypes” such as the licentious Platinum, the village idiot Baryta, and the mischievous Mercurius. 
Obviously, such little monsters manifest many more defects, many more homeopathic symptoms, than Carcinosinum, Saccharum album, Candida albicans, Cyclamen, Crataegus oxycantha ... but are they really less sick? Do they deserve less attention than Hepar sulphur or Medorrhinum? 
The Rosaceae offer another very common form of suffering: an inner world of overflowing, overwhelming emotions that are very difficult to contain, a life of sacrifice, a forced self-denial, an extreme difficulty in living in the world without suffering for the pains of those less fortunate than us. These are diseases that strike at the heart, rheumatic, autoimmune ... 
Natural history, materia medica, clinical cases with long follow-up and authorised by the patient, repertory additions, differential diagnosis. Summary outline of the fundamental themes, characteristics, coherent groups of symptoms, motifs, pathologies and syndromes successfully treated in my personal case history for the following remedies:
1) Prunus spinosa 
2) Spiraea ulmaria 
3) Sanguisorba officinalis 
4) Pyrus americana 
5) Rosa damascena 
6) Agrimonia eupatoria 
7) Crataegus oxycantha 
8) Rubus idaeus 
9) Rubus fructicosus 
10) Fragaria vesca
In the case of fungi, we cannot think in terms of homeopathic families. Fungi are, in fact, an entire kingdom of very special organisms: much of them is still wonderfully undiscovered, even by various branches of science. Fungi are also a kind of challenge to some deep-rooted clichés, to which even a large part of the homeopathic community remains bound.
Many still consider fungi to be plant organisms, when in fact they are in many ways more similar to animals than to plants. In fact, fungi are fungi, and those that “speak through the voices of our homeopathic patients” clearly tell us how proud they are of their absolute original diversity.
Essentially, fungi break down matter through a metabolism that our anthropocentric perspective would define as “destructive”: their purpose is the total mineralisation of organic matter.
Fungi are a “fourth kingdom”, a challenge to those who insist on reading our pharmacopoeia as consisting only of minerals, plants and animals.
Another “homeopathic kingdom”, if we really want to remain stubbornly attached to this triple taxonomic perspective, to which we can add imponderable remedies, nosodes and perhaps even gases and others. I prefer to study substances as they present themselves and not only for their place in the periodic table or in other taxonomies, trying to understand why something is what it is ... and not something else.
Fungi live, like us, but mainly hidden. They live, but their existence is fundamentally “catabolic”. They live mainly in environments that are hostile to plants and animals. They live, as we do, but following completely different paths and have done so for much longer, even though we have only been studying them for a short time.
Theoretically, our homeopathic literature recognises about seventy fungi. In fact, it is difficult to come across interesting cases beyond the well-known Agaricus muscarius, Bovista lycoperdon, Secale cornutum and Ustilago maydis.
In recent years, I have conducted some provings that I have never published, as I have simply had other priorities. Some of the fungi I propose for study are not yet present in our literature, but I thought that in the past other colleagues have written on several occasions about remedies that they had the intuition to study and prescribe, feeling then the duty to inform our community. I hope that in the near future I will be able to devote myself to publishing these provings, as it is not out of the question that someone else may do so, confirming, improving or refuting my experiences.
I wanted to offer as complete a picture as possible of this “kingdom”. I would like to reiterate that I do not consider fungi to be a “homeopathic family”, but I would suggest that we can recognise some broad common traits by broadening the scope of the concept of homeopathic similarity. I refer you to the case studies and your own judgement ...
Natural history, materia medica, clinical cases with long follow-up and authorised by the patient, repertory additions, differential diagnosis. Summary of the fundamental themes, characteristics, coherent groups of symptoms, motifs, pathologies and syndromes successfully treated in my personal case history for the following remedies.
1) Agaricus muscarius
2) Bovista lycoperdon
3) Ustilago maydis
4) Secale cornutum
5) Boletus laricis
6) Psilocybe caerulescens
7) Boletus satanas
8) Boletus edulis
9) Phallus impudicus
10) Cordyceps sinensis
11) Auricularia polytricha
12) Lentinula edodes
13) Candida albicans
14) Boleus lucidus
This is the first volume of my Clinical Materia Medica. There is a specific reason why I decided to write this book on milks. Homeopathically speaking, these remedies have undeniable similarities, and not only in terms of what we call local symptoms: somatic manifestations that are sometimes superficial and sometimes less so. 
The similarities with regard to the most significant vulnerabilities, which I define as the fundamental themes of the remedies, as well as other purely behavioural and clinical traits, are striking. Equally evident are the similarities between remedies that not only all come from the same animal kingdom, all from mammals and all from “substances” that are almost identical in chemical composition and function: the milk. The first and only food of every baby animal, different in each species to ensure its development in the time necessary and specific to each mammal: whether a predator, prey or domestic animal. 
However, this substance, together with its biochemistry, also represents the bond between mother and child. It is a vital element symbolising continuity after development in the womb. It is an element that interprets the first detachment, an epoch-making step towards individuality, both in the first days of life and at the beginning of weaning. 
How interesting it is that humans are the only ones who continue to feed on it even after that time! 
Special thanks to Giovanni Marotta for the introduction to the book. 
Natural history, materia medica, clinical cases with long follow-up and authorised by the patient, repertory additions, differential diagnosis. Summary of the fundamental themes, characteristics, coherent groups of symptoms, motifs, pathologies and syndromes successfully treated in my personal case history for the following remedies.:
1) Lac caninum 
2) Lac felinum 
3) Lac vaccinum defloratum 
4) Lac equinum 
5) Lac ovinum 
6) Lac caprinum 
7) La suis 
8) Lac asinum 
9) Lac lupinum 
10) Lac leoninum 
11) Lac loxodonta africana 
12) Lac delphinum 
13) Lac glama 
14) Lac humanum
Praxis was published in 2004 and presents the rudiments of my thinking and the foundations of my original model of study, research and work. I am looking forward to writing a new bbok that will clarify what is illustrated in this one, after more than 20 years of applying this model and evolving my thinking through continuous discussion of my clinical practice. Nevertheless, Praxis remains a text of fundamental importance for those interested in better understanding the Method of Complexity in Homeopathic Medicine.
The decision to deal specifically with certain drug remedies was a deliberate one: in fact, one of the foundations of this method is precisely the concept of the homeopathic family, which does not respect the rigidity of botanical taxonomies, nor of others which, in my opinion, are not focused on the clinical aspect and, above all, on the concept of the organisation of the themes that characterise similar remedies.
The clinical cases I present clearly demonstrate the similarities between these remedies, even though they are substances from completely different botanical taxonomies, even different kingdoms, as Bufo is an animal, Agaricus is a fungus, Aether is a gas, and Lithium carbonicum is a mineral. And yet ...
The first volume deals with:
The concept of similarity and its application
The definition of themes in homeopathic medicine, their hierarchy and organisation.
The concept of homeopathic families and subfamilies.
The so-called case taking and negative diagnosis.
The analysis of the clinical case.
Clinical material and criteria for the validity of cases.
Repertory additions.

The first tome of the second volume:
Drugs in Homeopathic Medicine
1) Anhalonium lewinii
2) Psilocybe caerulescens
3) Agaricus muscarius
4) Bovista lycoperdon
5) Convolvulus duartinus
6) Nabalus serpentaria
The second tome of the second volume:
7) Bufo rana
8) Coca eritroxylon
9) Lithium carbonicum
10) Piper methysticum
11) Cannabis indica
12) Penthorum sedoides
13) Camphora officinalis

The third volume of the second volume:
14) Aether
15) Hydrogenium
16) Laurocerasus
17) Banisteropsis caapi
Solanaceae is a book written by Betty Wood and taken from a seminar she organised for the NEHA (New England Homeopathic Association), which lasted seven days and was held in Boston. Belladonna is a giant in our literature, certainly one of those remedies in the repertory with an exaggerated number of symptoms which, in my opinion, only correspond to it to a very small extent.
Between around 30,000 symptoms in the repertory and the approximately 300 that are truly significant for each remedy, the disproportion is enormous. We still hear colleagues argue that Belladonna is a remedy limited to acute cases: it is right to respect the opinions of others as much as we respect what is reported in our literature and, above all, the impossibility of closing our eyes and minds to the experience we have had with patients.
Belladonna, and several other similar remedies, is a very useful remedy and, as such, recognisable and usable in any circumstance, with undeniable evidence in many chronic patients.
As in my first book on methodology, Praxis, I wanted to emphasise what I have observed since the beginning of my clinical experience: how much the homeopathic relationship between remedies transcends botanical taxonomies and how, within those classifications, we find remedies that are not at all similar. Belladonna can certainly be confused with Stramonium, Hyosciamus, Mandragora, Solanum nigrum, Datura metel and other botanical solanaceae, but in my experience it has almost nothing to do with Tabacum, Capsicum, Dulcamara, Lycopersicum, Solanum tuberosum and others. On the other hand, Gallicum acidum, Lyssinum, Tanacetum, and others show extremely interesting similarities in their homeopathic profile, which are illustrated in the text through cases followed up over a long period of time. 
Notes on natural history, materia medica, clinical cases with long follow-ups and authorised by the patient, repertorial additions, differential diagnoses, pathologies and syndromes successfully treated in my personal case history for the following remedies:
1) Belladonna
2) Mandragora
3) Gallicum acidum
4) Solanum nigrum
5) Lyssinum
6) Hyosciamus niger
7) Capsicum
8) Dulcamara
9) Tabacum
10) Solanum tuberosum aegrotans
11) Lycopersicum esculentum
12) Solanum tuberosum
InSEcurity is a text written by Betty Wood and taken from a seminar she organised for the NEHA (New England Homeopathic Association), which lasted seven days and was held in Boston. The Italian translation was edited by Rossana Ceriani.
Insecurity, in its many facets, is a problem we face in our daily practice and which our literature reports in a fragmented and rather imprecise manner. In fact, it is not really sufficient to rely on the suggestions of various repertories under the heading “Want of self confidence” without considering the numerous cross-references, which are not exhaustive. If we consider how clearly insecurity is expressed on a somatic level through numerous symptoms: from sweating under the armpits or palms of the hands, frequent urination, diarrhoea, stuttering, insomnia, erectile dysfunction and vaginismus, asthma, dizziness and nausea ... to name but a few. Although a week-long seminar on this topic may seem long, and although the many remedies presented are not limited to the usual Lycopodium, Gelsemium and a few others, the subject is so vast that the aim of the seminar, as in the text, is to encourage a more complex reading of insecurity, both in its most obvious manifestations on the soma and in relation to other aspects of the patient's suffering.
Notes on natural history, materia medica, clinical cases with long follow-up and authorised by the patient, repertory additions, differential diagnosis, pathologies and syndromes successfully treated in my personal case history for the following remedies.
1) Aluminium compounds
2) Barium compounds
3) Gossypium
4) Saccharum album
5) Epiphegus virginiana
6) Tabacum
7) Daphne indica
8) Aconitum napellus
9) Magnetis polus australis
10) Thallium metallicum
11) ... and others
This small book, or rather pamphlet, was written by Betty Wood based on notes taken during a five-day seminar dedicated to some remedies from this homeopathic family.
The experience gained from prescribing these remedies in cases with long follow-ups shows how important the relationship with “mortality” and the unique resilience of these patients are. Obviously, I am not suggesting that this group of remedies is the only one to deal with this issue in such a dramatic way, but I would like to emphasise the peculiarity of a life marked by hypondria, which seems to leave room for an acceptance that is yet to be discovered.
Notes on natural history, materia medica, clinical cases with long follow-up and authorised by the patient, repertory additions, differential diagnosis, pathologies and syndromes successfully treated in my personal case history for the following remedies.
1) Cactus grandiflorus
2) Cereus bonplandii
3) Cereus serpentinus
4) Opuntia alba spina
5) Opuntia vulgaris
6) Agave americana
In our literature, there is often a tendency to confuse the experience of generic anger with that of humiliation, particularly when anger is suffered and, for many reasons, seems particularly difficult to express and communicate.
This text is the result of notes taken by Peter Federer during a seminar held in Switzerland, where I presented some clinical cases related to remedies that are well known in our literature, with the aim of differentiating them and specifying their specific personality organisations and most common pathologies.
Alongside the classics Staphysagria, Ignatia and Chamomilla, remedies such as Ipecacuanha, Magnetis polus australis, Ferrum magneticum, Chelidonium and others appear ...
From Winnicot's concept of the False Self to what is now technically known as Fantastic Pseudology, or simply the need to construct and/or wear armour that can make us appear better or more or less the consciously mask that protect our most fragile parts ...
A defensive strategy that can be expressed in many different ways. Some of these are described through various clinical cases and clinical materia medica, which has emerged and been collected from the stories of many patients.
Notes on natural history, materia medica, clinical cases with long follow-ups and authorised by the patient, repertory additions, differential diagnoses, pathologies and syndromes successfully treated in my personal case history for the following remedies.
Carcinosinum, Staphysagria, some little-known homeopathic milks, some Rosaceae, some Primulaceae, some acids, some drugs, Saccharum album, Tilia europea, Folliculinum, Sulphur, Chromium, Niccolum, Zincum, Coccus cacti, some parasites, Palladium, Thuja and some Brassicaceae ...
(Italiano) The sea remedies
Courses Notes 2
Courses Notes 3
Courses Notes 4
Courses Notes 5
Courses Notes 6
Courses Notes 7

Leave a Reply